Search This Blog

Monday, March 7, 2016

DO-RE-MI - A Brief History of Shape Note Singing

If you mention music to most people, the most common thought is High School Band or a music class you had in school at some point.  Many of us do not know how to read music, much less, read shape note (1) music. We have all grown up listening to music that is based on the Major Diatonic Scale (2). If you can sing at all, you can sing this scale. The tones of this scale and the syllables we use for the names of those tones are most commonly heard in "DO-RE-MI" by Rogers and Hammerstein’s “The Sound of Music.”  In the movie, this song was used to teach the children to sing. These same syllables are still used today to teach people to sight read music.

Guido of Arezzo
The practice of singing music to syllables designating pitch goes back to about AD 1000 with the work of Guido of Arezzo (3) ; other early work in this area includes the cipher notation of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (18th century), and the tonic sol-fa of John Curwen  (19th century). 

Shape notes (4) proved popular in America, and quickly a wide variety of hymnbooks were prepared making use of them. The shapes were eventually extirpated in the northeastern U.S. by a so-called "better music" movement, headed by Lowell Mason. But in the South, the shapes became well entrenched, and multiplied into a variety of traditions. Ananias Davisson's (5) Kentucky Harmony is generally considered the first Southern shape-note tune book.   Singing schools became a popular thing in pre-Revolutionary days, with many English colonists bringing their knowledge to America and incorporating it in America's earliest churches, without the accompaniment of musical instruments. 

All "church music" was originally sung “a capella” or without instrumental musical
 Vitalian of Capua
accompaniment. For the first 1000 years in the history of Christianity, this was so. While it varies upon locality, generally in the 6th Century the first instrumental accompaniments began to appear in churches.  Pope Vitalian (6) is regarded to have first introduced organs into some of the churches of Western Europe around 670 A.D.; but the earliest trustworthy account is that of one sent as a present by the Greek emperor Constantine Copronymus to Pepin, King of Franks in 755 A.D (7). 

There were instruments of music of many and various kinds that were in use during the age of Jesus as well as the apostles. Their never being introduced into the worship service by Jesus, the apostles or the early Christians, either by commandment or example,  is evidence that they were were not seen as a means of expressing praise, nor did they seem to be required. Whether we wish to debate the scriptural use is another discussion. This is to simply look at the history surrounding the development of singing and "music" in the "Christian" setting. It should be noted though, that Paul states in Eph.4 and 5 the intent is to edify, teach and build the assembly. It is not to entertain, nor is it to show off. The rules of 1 Corinthians seems to apply in this instance, even if it is viewed as exercising a gift, that if it doesn't edify, teach and encourage the fellowship of the group, then it is perhaps best not done.  

Shape Notes, with the advent of standardized written music composition, was adapted as a means to educate people. The idea behind shape notes was and is that the parts of a vocal work can be learned more quickly and easily if the music is printed in shapes that match up with the syllables with which the notes of the musical scale are sung. It would enable harmony and melody. When a song is first sung this method normally employs singing the syllables (reading them from the shapes) to solidify their command over the notes. Next, they sing the same notes to the words of the music. 

Some think it archaic, others think it is enlightening. Either way, we cannot deny that God wishes us to raise our voice in song unto the heavens and declare His praise. We cannot deny, the joyous song that leaps into our hearts when we come to know the true freedom that God has given us in His Son. We cannot deny, that even in pain, the heart can express itself in song to God. Some of the greatest songs we sing are not the compositions of masters, but the mere tunes of everyday  ordinary people, trying to express what is on their hearts to God. Because the first place that music had, was between man and God!

Jim
________________________________________________________
Footnotes
(1) The shape-note method of singing from written music first appeared in a book called "The Easy Instructor, printed in 1801, although the teaching of it started much earlier in the United States as a means of helping the common person to read music.

(2) MAJOR DIATONIC SCALE - In music theory, a diatonic scale (from the Greek διατονικός, meaning "[progressing] through tones", also known as the heptatonia prima and set form 7-35) is a seven note musical scale comprising five whole steps and two half steps, in which the half steps are maximally separated. Thus between each of the two half steps lie either two or three whole steps, with the pattern repeating at the octave. The term diatonic originally referred to the diatonic genus, one of the three genera of the ancient Greeks.

(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guido_of_Arezzo

(4)  There is a distinction between this and another common version of shape note singing called “Sacred Harp.” Sacred Harp style of singing stems from singing schools that were conducted in the colonial period of the US, and preserved in the rural South.

(5) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ananias_Davisson 

(6)   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Vitalian

(7 )  The American Encyclopedia, Vol. 7, page 688  

Monday, February 29, 2016

BOOK REVIEW: Beyond The Shades of Gray by Dean Bailey

I rarely give glowing reviews to books, but this is one that I am going to start out by saying OH WOW!  

Mr.Bailey has done one of the most magnificent jobs on this subject that I have seen. Let me caution you, that if you are squeamish about books dealing with sexuality, heterosexual or otherwise then you probably won't like it because it will make you uncomfortable. You will take a good long look at what God actually says about sexuality, bias pro and con on the subject and will make you take an honest look at yourself!  It will show you how that stereotypes are a dangerous thing on both sides, how prejudice runs on both sides. We all get comfortable in our skins of various sorts, without taking a look beyond them. We adapt mindsets and behaviors often pressed upon us by society and people that we know, without honestly considering whether they are biblical or not. Sometimes, we don't even care if they are biblical, and blame God for "the way that we are." In this book, if you are a believer, you are going to find the very practical facing of the issues that Jesus presents in the Sermon on the Mount in Matt.5 and 6, that all sin runs deeper than what is on the surface. Sexual orientation doesn't matter where this is concerned and you will wind up asking yourself, "why am I doing - saying - acting like this?" 

This book does not just deal with biblical aspects. This is a very factual book, dealing with everything from politics to beliefs, to science, biology and more. If you are a spiritual leader - you NEED this book!  If you are a counselor, you NEED this book! If you are a Christian struggling with the issue of sexual orientation on any front, personal or otherwise - you NEED this book!

My rating -- twenty stars!  I have ready many books on this subject, and this is the first that I have seen that has dealt with it as openly, honestly and spiritually as it should. GET IT!  But, be prepared when you do - to confront parts of yourself that you may not wish to see. I hope that it is as helpful to you as I have found it to be for me.

Jim

Thursday, February 18, 2016

BOOK REVIEW: The James Code

The James Code by O.J.Hawkins, came to me as a hardback book. I must say that this was good to see, in today's digital age. It was nice to have something to hold in my hand, and read at my leisure. I must admit that I didn't know what to expect in receiving the book. I have studied the book of James many times. I appreciate the content of the book, written as a devotional style book to be read weekly. While I am not afforded that luxury in being given a book to review within a certain framework of time. The book is full of good and sound advice, and has things written in a practical way for application. Yet, I guess I was disappointed in a couple of things. It is the typical "gift style" book meant to be presented to a graduate or to someone as a gift. There's nothing wrong with that, but the title "The James Code" belies the revealing of a mystery. Perhaps it is my own downfall in having studied James and looking for its mysteries, but I do not see how the book reveals anything of a "code." Practical insights - yes. Practical Wisdom - Yes. Practical thought - yes.  Is this a code? I guess so, in a way - but the title left me expecting something that I didn't see personally.

Please don't take my criticism here wrong. I am not saying that the book is a bad book. I found the material very good and one that I will keep in my library and likely refer to upon occasion. The subtitle is "52 Scripture Principles for Putting Your Faith Into Action."  I think this is more of what the book is about. While I may have my issues with the Title, the book is good and I think would make an excellent devotion book for anyone.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

PaleoJudaica.com: Byron, Herodotus, and Sennacherib

PaleoJudaica.com: Byron, Herodotus, and Sennacherib: HISTORY: Of mice and men: How archaeology confirms a Bible story (Mark Woods, Christian Today ). The headline exaggerates a little, since t...

BOOK REVIEW: Curio by Evangeline Denmark

When perusing the books to review popped up, I chose this one, Curio by Evangeline Denmark.  I chose it for several reasons. I wanted something fanciful, as I have been doing too much serious reading lately. The title caught me, as it brought back memories of something that my wife and I once thought of doing. Finally, the description of this book as "steam-punk" was curious to me.

My first impression of the book after reading its entirety, is intriguing. Even with the things stated above, I wasn't quite prepared for this type of novel. I was not used to things described in early 1900's industry terms, mixed with Chemists and a bizarre heroine theme to boot. This was a good read for someone looking for fanciful and outside the norms. I got involved in the book, and found myself wanting to go back to it to read and finish it. This is unusual, as with most I'm ready to put it down after the first several chapters. Ms.Denmark has a unique imagination and a talent for getting her thoughts down on paper. I hope that she writes more. 

I admit that the "steam-punk" was a little different, and there were places that I found things choppy and hard to piece together. But, that may be because I am not used to reading this style of book.  This should not detract you (the reader) from getting the book and reading it yourself.  It is an excellent themed book for younger audiences (and some of us older ones too), it has a good flow, a good plot and is able to engage the reader without all of the extraneous "stuff" that many of its counter-parts in the world have.  As regards personal tastes, for my part I would have wished a little bit more background as to why the characters are in the positions that they are in, and why the worlds mentioned exist. I believe Ms.Denmark will only get better with time.

My overall rating of the book is good and I recommend that you get it if you are looking for a fanciful read, or if you are into "steam-punkish" style reading.  Even if you aren't, read it anyway, it will help get your mind off of daily stuff. Ms.Denmark - write more...I would be interested to see what else is out there.

Monday, January 18, 2016

BOOK REVIEW: H3 Leadership: Be Humble. Stay Hungry. Always Hustle by Brad Lomenick

H3 Leadership: Be Humble. Stay Hungry. Always Hustle by Brad Lomenick 


I have been a motivational follower for some time, and have had the opportunity to sit and hear some of the top speakers of this industry. While there has always been a slightly spiritual element to the speakers, and some have cited Bible references, I have found only two books in my 30+ years that have dealt with the subject using the scripture as the base of the discussion. This is the second. I'm not saying that there aren't more out there, but this is only the second in my encounters that I felt worthy even to pick up and read. 

At first, the book has the typical motivational book read about knowing who you are and where you are going in life and I wondered, "Where are the scriptures?" Then, I went back and re-read the preface and understood that we already know the scripture (or should) - so what we need to do is implement the principles. So, I began reading the book in a new light. I saw the habits that he refers to about developing, the goals seeking were already things Jesus taught in the sermon on the Mount and throughout the gospels. It intrigued me that the author brought these principles to play in the ever changing world of today's workforce. Where jobs aren't certain and life is ahead, these principles are good on any resume'.  I also found it enlightening that the author also appeals to other authors and sources to refer the reader to to further equip themselves in the endeavors that he promotes. I also liked the tips that he gives you in each chapter, that act as a personal application of the principles taught in the chapter. He also includes tips from other authors and those considered experts in the field which I thought was a unique twist.

This book gets a high mark from me. I found myself getting involved in the book and wanting to apply what it taught. However, it is not for everyone. If you are wanting to learn how to improve yourself motivationally, and wanting to be a better leader - then this book is a good one to have in your library. It will be one that you go back and re-read and refer to often. In some circles, it could even be used if accompanied by a workbook as a Bible Class on Leadership.  Even if you are not "Biblical" inclined, don't shy away from this book just because it is.  There are good principles taught here that you will find useful and that will make you a better person.

Monday, January 11, 2016

SOUL and SPIRIT - Huh???

In recent discussion in class regarding the keeping of the SOUL, we have gone in depth to discuss WHAT the soul is. In general and brief description, it is the eternal part of us that God put into us at the point of creation. Yet, in the process of this discussion, arose the question - Is there a difference between the soul and the spirit?

Essentially, there are three terms in the scripture that are used when referring to what God has placed into man. 
  • Hebrew - Nephesh (SOUL) means a breathing creature, that is, animal or (abstractly) vitality;
  • Greek Pneuma (SPIRIT) a current of air, that is, breath (as a blast) or a breeze; by analogy andfiguratively a spirit, that is the rational soul,or vital principle, mental disposition, etc.,
  • Greek Pseuche (SOUL)  breath, that is, (by implication) spirit, abstractly or concretely - the sentient principle of vitality; thus distinguished from Pneuma which is the rational and immortal. This word is more akin to the original Hebrew word used in Genesis, where man became a living animated being.

This can be confusing, especially when you have three words that are used for what is to us the same thing. What is best to understand at this point, is that we are trying to put into words and define something that is what Job describes, "Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know. (Job 42:3)." It is like John in writing the Revelation, trying to put into words scenes that were beyond human description. These same words are used of the creative power of God in Genesis when the
world was made. When God "breathes" into man, it is the variation of the same word used for what he breathes into man and makes man a soul. When the essence of God creates in Genesis 1 and the "Spirit" of God moves, it is the word RUACH which is literally translated breath or wind, but in this instance this word is used because of the force of the wind. Yet, it is described as the creative essence of God. How do we describe something too wonderful, too powerful for us to even imagine? How do we describe in words the force that it would take to make a sun, a universe, life? Therein, is the difficulty and the fault of human language.

But, what about the human soul? 
Are the soul and spirit different? 

How do you describe that integral part of us that God put in us, yet, has no substance and we cannot see?  This is not to say that man has not been inventive. In 1907, Duncan McDougall undertook experiments of dying people to determine if the soul had weight or mass. His findings were published in the New York Times, March 11, 1907. Even then, the "soul" defied description. When appearing to Thomas after the resurrection, Jesus tells us that, "a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.(Lk.24:39)" This is why the term "breath" is used. It is not a tangible thing, but to describe it, we can only describe it as wind, breath, air.  We know it exists, but we cannot define it. There are other variations and adjectives that can be used to "type" it. The scriptures use the term "evil" spirit, a "new" spirit., etc. But, it all boils down to two particular things regarding the human "soul." One seems more descriptive of what is inside of us, the other used to manifest what comes forth from us. Soul, seems to be used to describe what God breathed into us and what we became. The word Spirit seems to be used more indicatively of describing what is being projected out of us from that source.  This seems implied of Lk.9:55 when Jesus rebukes James and John for their demeanor in wanting to call fire down from heaven upon people. 

Soul and spirit are not different parts of what God breathed into us, they are simply two
words trying to describe the same thing in a different way. Is it hard to understand? Yes. Can you touch it? No Is it flesh and blood? No. But - it is who we are. It is our strength, might, heart existence all rolled up into one thing, that when this body dies, it will live on. 

Now the question is...what will live on. What is there in me, living in my heart?  If we accept the Bible's terms for godliness, then is what is within us clean or unclean as the Bible would describe? 

From this, there are three things that are apparent from the scripture:

  1. God sent his Son to die, so that what God has given me, I might give back to God clean, pure, and whole (Jn.3:16; 2 Pet.3:14)
  2. The Soul of man has a destiny, and how I use the Spirit God breathed into me, is my choice. We just have to understand that choices have consequences (Mt..25:31-46; Heb.6:1-8; 10:26-30). Sin fragments the soul. When God created us, he states, "It is good." When sin is in and is left in the soul, the soul is no longer "Good." That is why the soul needs a redeemer (1 Cor.6:20) and while living life, it needs a Shepherd (Psa.23).
  3. Don't misunderstand. God's word can cut through hypocrisy (Heb.4:12). It is able to pierce and cleave between the soul and the spirit. In Mt.23:7 Jesus criticized the Scribes and Pharisees for their hypocrisy - appearing on the outside to be one thing, yet inside another.  God's word can do that with us too! Don't think you can change your destiny by pretending. Even our innermost thoughts can be discerned by God.


So, what does your SOUL - your SPIRIT say about you?

Jim